Our other sites
Today's newsletter | Register | Subscribe | Feedback

Plastic: to recycle or watch it going up in smoke?

By Hamish Champ
Posted 9 August 2012

Everyone in their right mind wants to see plastics recycled. It makes sense on so many fronts.

But, as even the British Plastics Federation’s Philip Law points out, that fraction which you can’t recycle is better off being used to generate energy than finding its way into a great big hole in the ground.

Air Products’ investment on Teesside is a positive sign for the UK’s attractiveness as a place to invest, something the deputy prime minister highlights.

The development is also likely to be just the first in a series of facilities which will eventually produce energy for all sorts of things.

Which is all good. Isn’t it?

Well yes, it is, but there are caveats. The main one revolves around the public’s perception of what is recyclable and what one can just chuck away in the not-wholly certain knowledge that it is going to a good home.

Of course creating energy from waste is a good thing, but the message to consumers to look at what they are throwing away and what they are considering for recycling must continue to be pressed home and pressed home hard.

The recycling – reusing – of materials, any materials, is a vital component of a sustainable, viable society. But barriers, both political and economic, are always nearby.

The many and varied policies adopted by local authorities about how they and consumers dispose of recyclable and non-recyclable waste can be confusing enough.

Requirements to put certain types of waste in different-coloured containers can vex the most even-tempered and environmentally-minded of people; just ask TV stars Richard and Judy.

So yes, the Air Products venture is a good one. But we shouldn’t get carried away.

The last thing the recycling industry – and indeed the environment – needs is for consumers to start chucking everything, recyclable or otherwise, into their household waste on the basis they think it’s effectively being turned into cheap energy for their home, when in fact it could well be heading for a great big hole somewhere in China.


Comment on this article.

Comments:

My pleasure at seeing the headline about the power from waste incinerator was rapidly diminished when I saw that it was thanks to a foreign company investment. In my view, such a plant is long overdue, and there have been many 'anti' barriers to overcome, so how come it is now a foreign company that will benefit from the government subsidies and whatever profit is available? Why can't we do it? The foreign ownership will also include, I believe, ownership of any intellectual property rights resulting from the improvements in processes and machinery so that once again we fall a little bit further behind the worldwide competition. I know we don't have much money but I really don't like us selling our future as well as our present.

- 15 August 2012 - John Hickman

I think much of the issue of recycling comes down to lack of information being passed down to the general public from those within government, especially local government. A good starting point would be a simple public information campain to make it clear to the general public that every thing that goes into the "Landfill" bin results in higher council tax bills whereas anything being segregated for "recycling" helps reduce council tax charges, assuming all other services are maintained at the same level. Once the public understand that their action has a direct effect on their cost of living, a further public information campain can educate the public on the various ways that waste can be recycled, with energy generation being an excellent method to recycle those materials that can't be otherwise recycled in a cost effective manner.

- 10 August 2012 - Chris Wheeler

[ Back ]



TOOLBOX

ALSO IN THIS SECTION
MOST POPULAR STORIES
Site Index [ + ]
Site Index [ - ]
Home:  PRW.com | Contact editorial | Contact advertising | Features List 2012 | About us
End Markets:  Automotive | Packaging | Construction | Medical | Consumer Products | Rubber
Processes:  Injection moulding | Blow moulding | Extrusion | Thermoforming
Supplier News:  Machinery | Materials | Recycling | Moulds | Design
Polymer Prices:  LME prices | Market outlooks | Resin selector
Industry Issues:  Environment | Regulation Competitiveness
Plastics Knowledge:  Knowledge Bank
Comment:  Champ Chat | Clark's Place | Editorials | Business features
People:  Movers & Shakers
PRW Business Directory:  Directory
Classifieds:  Jobs | Classifieds
View:  Mobile | Desktop
Our Events:  PDM | Conferences
Industry Awards:  Industry Awards
Diary: Diary
Advertise with PRW
Subscribe:  PRW print | E-mail products
Reprints:  Reprints
List Rental:  List Rental
Crain Communications:  Crain Communications | Crain Publications

Entire contents copyright 2013 by Crain Communications Inc.
Plastics & Rubber Weekly and PRW.com are published by Crain Communications Ltd (registered in England & Wales No. 01576350).
Registered Office: 100 New Bridge Street, London, EC4V 6JA, United Kingdom.