Our other sites
Today's newsletter | Register | Subscribe | Feedback

Negligent Ley Rubber fined after injury

By Andrew Smith
Posted 11 September 2012

A Liverpool-based rubber manufacturer has been fined a total of more than £18,000 after a worker suffered serious hand injuries in unguarded machinery.

Ley Rubber admitted breaching the Health and Safety at Work Regulations during a hearing before South Sefton magistrates on 6 September.

The court was told that in Dec 2010, the 47-year-old employee had been making adjustments to a moulding machine running at 200C degrees when the metal clamps holding the rubber moulds in place suddenly released.

One of the clamps trapped the employee's hand against the machine's control panel. As a result he suffered burns and crush injuries.

An investigation by the HSE then discovered that the machine lacked the correct guard. The company was fined £15,000 with £3,500 costs.

After the case a senior HSE spokesman commented: "The employee still has difficulty using his left hand nearly two years on from the incident. If Ley Rubber had carried out a proper assessment of the risks its employees faced then it would have been able to identify the need for guards to be installed on the machine.

"The firm was able to fit suitable guards just two days after we visited the site, but if they had been in place at the time of the incident then it could have been avoided altogether."


Comment on this article.

Comments:

Anyone reading this article should not be complacent and believe it couldn't happen where they work. The HSE should be seen as a resource as they have a great deal of very useful and practical advise on their web site http://www.hse.gov.uk/rubber/index.htm which is partically useful for all size companies, but especially useful for smaller companies who can't afford a dedicated health and safety officer. Based on the more detailed report on the HSE web site I believe in this instance the press was likely to be a small pneumatic operated joining press, which can be difficult to guard and guards themselves can often lead to potential safety issues, but had the operator been better trained to ensure he blocked open the plattens whilst his hands were in danger the incident could probably have been avoided.

- 11 September 2012 - Chris Wheeler

[ Back ]



TOOLBOX

ALSO IN THIS SECTION
MOST POPULAR STORIES
Site Index [ + ]
Site Index [ - ]
Home:  PRW.com | Contact editorial | Contact advertising | Features List 2012 | About us
End Markets:  Automotive | Packaging | Construction | Medical | Consumer Products | Rubber
Processes:  Injection moulding | Blow moulding | Extrusion | Thermoforming
Supplier News:  Machinery | Materials | Recycling | Moulds | Design
Polymer Prices:  LME prices | Market outlooks | Resin selector
Industry Issues:  Environment | Regulation Competitiveness
Plastics Knowledge:  Knowledge Bank
Comment:  Champ Chat | Clark's Place | Editorials | Business features
People:  Movers & Shakers
PRW Business Directory:  Directory
Classifieds:  Jobs | Classifieds
View:  Mobile | Desktop
Our Events:  PDM | Conferences
Industry Awards:  Industry Awards
Diary: Diary
Advertise with PRW
Subscribe:  PRW print | E-mail products
Reprints:  Reprints
List Rental:  List Rental
Crain Communications:  Crain Communications | Crain Publications

Entire contents copyright 2013 by Crain Communications Inc.
Plastics & Rubber Weekly and PRW.com are published by Crain Communications Ltd (registered in England & Wales No. 01576350).
Registered Office: 100 New Bridge Street, London, EC4V 6JA, United Kingdom.